Basis of Microwave Heating

Microwave oven has become very popular in recent years, and has become an essential appliance in any kitchen. However, microwave heating seems an esoteric, almost magical, issue for many people who have the oven at their home. In this post we are going to explain the basis of microwave heating, not only for the food heating, but also for industrial heating and HDW (hot domestic water).

In 1946, a British researcher from the Raytheon Corporation, Mr. Percy Spencer, working on RADAR applications, discovered that a candy bar in his pocket was melted. He was testing a magnetron and began experimenting, confining the EM field inside a metal cavity. He tested first with corn and then with a chicken egg. This latter one exploded.

He verified that a high intensity EM field affected food due to the presence of water inside. Water is a bad propagator of radio waves, because it has a high dielectric constant and losses. Being a polar molecule, when a variable EM field is applied, the dipole tends to be oriented in the direction of the field, and that makes the water molecule is agitated, increasing its temperature. The popular belief is that this only happens at 2,4 GHz, but it actually happens throughout the microwave band. This frequency is used by the ovens because it is a frequency within a free emission band known as ISM (short for Industrial, Scientific and Medical). However, there are heating processes at 915MHz and another frequencies..

First, the water, like almost all dielectrics, has under normal conditions a complex dielectric constant ε=ε’−jε”. When this complex dielectric constant is introduced into the Maxwell equations, the complex term means a dielectric conductivity, by the next expression

$\sigma = \omega \epsilon" \epsilon_0$

This conductivity is not produced by the mobility of electrons, but by the mobility of the polar molecules of water. Therefore, it is higher as the frequency is increased.

On the other hand, the presence of this conductivity limits the microwaves penetration in the water, attenuating the EM intensity with distance. It is related to the depth of penetration, expressed by

$\delta_p=\dfrac {\lambda \sqrt{\epsilon'}}{2 \pi \epsilon"}$

and therefore at higher frequency, lower penetration depth. If the intensity of the electric field is |E|, and, by the Ohm’s law, the volumetric power is given by

$Q=\omega \epsilon" \epsilon_0 |E|^2$

This volumetric power will affect a specific region of the water, causing heating.

On the other hand, there is a heat transfer effect due to thermal conductivity, such that the surface heat flux is

$\dfrac {dQ_s}{dt}=-k \displaystyle \int_s {\vec \nabla T d \vec S}$

Applying the divergence theorem, the variation of heat per unit volume will be

$\dfrac {dQ_V}{dt}=-k \nabla^2 T$

This flow distributes the temperature inside the volumetric element, lossing energy, and therefore its sign is negative.

WATER HEATING

Under macroscopic conditions, the energy per unit volume that must be applied to water increasing its temperature is given by

$E_v=\rho_m c_e \Delta T$

with ρM the water density and ce its specific heat, being ΔT the increasing of the temperature. Speaking in terms of power, we will have to

$Q=\rho_m c_e \dfrac{dT}{dt}$

where it must be calculate the global time variation of the temperature, and being a fluid that can be in movement, it must be applied the material derivative, an operator that includes the time variation and the convection. Applying this operator we may get

$\dfrac{dT}{dt}=\dfrac{\partial T}{\partial t}+\vec v \vec \nabla T$

and the volumetric power is given by

$Q=\rho_m c_e \left(\dfrac{\partial T}{\partial t}+\vec v \vec \nabla T \right)-k\nabla^2 T$

which is the expression that governs the water heating when a volumetric density of EM power Q is applied.

On the other hand, fluid movement is governed by the Navier-Stokes equations, through

$\rho_M \dfrac {\partial \vec v}{\partial t}=-\vec \nabla P+\mu \nabla^2 \vec v + \rho_M \vec g$

Where P is the volumetric pressure, μ the fluid viscosity and g the gravitational field.

HDW SYSTEMS USING MICROWAVES

In the case of a hot domestic water system, there would be two possibilities of heating:

1. Through a closed circuit system moving a water flow, due to its very low viscosity (10-3 Pa·s).
2. Using a vessel with rest water and accumulating the heat to transmit it to another areas.

In the first case, the volumetric power necessary to heat a closed circuit system must solve both with the thermal variation and the Navier-Stokes equations, and its efficiency is greater than in the second one, where the expression of the thermal increase is given by

$Q+k\nabla^2 T=\rho_m c_e \dfrac{\partial T}{\partial t}$

This equations can be solved using the FEM method, as we saw in the post about the simulation.

In any case, although both methods are possible, the first method will always be cheaper than the second, since the second can only be applied to raise the temperature of another fluid in motion and will need more energy due to the losses due to that transfering of heat..

IS IT POSSIBLE TO HEAT OTHER MATERIALS USING MICROWAVES?

Normally, any material that has losses by dielectric constant can be capable of being heated using microwaves, if these losses do not raise the electrical conductivity to values that cancel the electric field (in a perfect conductor, the electric field is zero). If we write the expression obtained in terms of electric field we get

$\omega \epsilon" \epsilon_0 |E|^2+k\nabla^2 T=\rho_m c_e \left(\dfrac{\partial T}{\partial t}+\vec v \vec \nabla T \right)$

and therefore, we can obtain a relationship between ε” and the increase of temperature at a given electric field |E|.

INFLUENCE ON THE HUMANS

The human body is another dielectric which contains mostly by water. Therefore, the effect of the EM radiation on our body should cause heating. Let’s study what would be the field that would increase our temperature above 50o C in one minute, reducing the expressions to

$\omega \epsilon" \epsilon_0 |E|^2=\rho_m c_e \dfrac{\Delta T}{\Delta t}$

Taking ε”=4,5 (water at 2,4 GHz), knowing that the average human density is 1100 kg/m3 and its specific heat, 14,23 kJ/kg o C, it is got the next

$|E|=\sqrt {\dfrac {1100 \cdot 14230 \cdot \left(\dfrac{50-33}{60} \right)}{2 \pi \cdot 2,4 \cdot 10^9 \cdot 4,5 \cdot 8,85 \cdot 10^{-12}}}=3,1 kV/m$

and a WIFI router emits with less than 2 V/m field strength at 1 m. of distance. Therefore, a WIFI router will not cause heating in our body or even if we are close by it..

And a mobile phone? These devices are already powerful … Well, at its emission peak either, since at most it will emit with 12 V/m, and we need 3100 V/m, about 260 times more. So the mobile does not warm our ear either. And keeping in mind the depth of penetration, as much the EM radiation gets to penetrate about 2 cm, attenuating the field strength in half and power to the fourth part, due to the dielectric conductivity of our body. That without keeping in mind that each of our tissues has a different attenuation capacity depending on its composition and structure.

CONCLUSION

This post tries to explain the microwave heating phenomenon based on the ones that produce this heating, and its possible industrial applications, apart from those already known as the popular oven that almost every kitchen already has as part of its home appliance furniture. One of the most immediate applications is in the HDW, although applications have also been achieved in other industrial areas. And although the microwaves produce that heating, the necessary field strengths are very far from the radiation we receive from mobile communications.

REFERENCES

1. Menéndez, J.A., Moreno, A.H. “Aplicaciones industriales del calentamiento con energía microondas”. Latacunga, Ecuador: Editorial Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, 2017, Primera Edición, pp 315. ISBN: 978-9978395-34-9
2. D. Salvi, Dorin Boldor, J. Ortego, G. M. Aita & C. M. Sabliov “Numerical Modeling of Continuous Flow Microwave Heating: A Critical Comparison of COMSOL and ANSYS”, Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, 2016, 44:4, 187-197, DOI: 10.1080/08327823.2010.11689787

Simulation on Physical Systems

I take a long time writing many post about the simulation. Main reason is because I have learned for many years the value of using computers for physical system analysis. Without these tools, I would never be able to get reliable results, because of the amount of calculations I would have to do. Modern simulators, able to solve complex calculations using the computers capacity, allow us to get a more realistic behavior for a complex system, knowing its structures. Physics and Engineering work every day with simulations to get better predictions and take decisions. In this post, I am going to show what are the most important parts we should be kept in mind about the simulation.

In 1982, physicist Richard Feynman published an article where he talked about the analysis of physical systems using computers (1). In those years, computer technology had progressed to a high level that it was possible to achieve a greater calculation capacity. New programming languages worked with complex formulas, such as FORTRAN, and allowed the calculations on systems by complex integro-differential equations, which resolution usually needed numerical methods. So, in those first years, physicists began to do simulations with programs able to solve the constitutive system equations, although not always with simple descriptions.

A great step forward in electronics was the SPICE program, at the beginning of 70s (2). This program, FORTRAN-based, was able to compute non-linear electronic circuits, removing the radiation effects, and solve the time-domain integral-differential equations. Over the years, the Berkeley’s SPICE became the first reference on simulation programs and its success being such that almost all the simulation programs developed along last years have its base on the Nagel and Pederson algorithms, developed in 70s.

From 80s, and searching to solve three-dimensional problems, the method of moments (MoM) was developed. It was come to solve systems raised as integral equations in the boundaries (3), being very popular. It was used in Fluid Mechanics, Acoustic Waves and Electromagnetism. Today, this one is still used to solve two-dimensional electromagnetic structures.

But the algorithms have got a huge progress, with the emergence of new finite element methods (FEM, frequency-domain) and time-domain finite differences (FDTD, time-domain) in 90s, based on the resolution of systems formulated by differential equations, important benchmarks on the generation of new algorithms able to solve complex systems (4). And with these new advances, the simulation contribution in Physics came to take spectacular dimensions.

WHAT IS THE VALUE OF AN ACCURATE MODEL?

When we are studying any physical phenomenon, we usually invoke a model. Whether an isolated phenomenon or within an environment, whether in Acoustic Waves, Electromagnetism or Quantum Mechanics, having a well-characterized model is essential to get its behavior, in terms of its variables. Using an accurate model increases our certainty on the results.

However, modeling is complex. It is needed to know what are the relationships between variables and from here, determine a formulation system that defines the behavior within a computer.

A model example is a piezoelectric material. In Electronics, piezoelectric materials are commonly used as resonators and it is usually to see these electronic devices (quartz or any other resonant material based on this property).

A piezoelectric model, very successful in the 40s, was developed by Mason (5). Thanks to the similarity between the Electromagnetic and Acoustic waves, he got to join both properties using transmission lines, based in the telegraphist’s equations, writing the constitutive equations. In this way, he developed a piezoelectric model which is still used today. This model can be seen in Fig. 1 and it has already been studied in previous posts.

Fig.1 – Modelo de piezoeléctrico de Mason

This model practically solved the small signal analysis in frequency domain, getting an impedance resonance trace as it is shown in Fig. 2

Fig.2 – Resultados del análisis del modelo de Mason

However, the models need to expand their predictive capacity.

The Mason model describes the piezoelectric behavior rightly when we are working in a linear mode. But it has faults when we need to know the large signal behavior. So new advances in the piezoelectric material studies included the non-linear relationships in its constitutive equations (6).

Fig. 3 – Modelo tridimensional de una inducción

In three-dimensional models, we must know well what are the characteristics that define the materials to have an optimal results. In the induction shown in Fig. 3, CoFeHfO is being used as a magnetic material. It has a frequency-dependent complex magnetic permeability that must be defined in the libraries.

The results will be better as the model is defined better, and this is the fundamental Physicist task: getting a reliable model from the studies on the phenomena and the materials.

The way to extract a model is usually done by direct measurement or through the derived magnitudes, using equations systems. With a right model definition, the simulation results will be more reliable.

ANALYSIS USING SIMULATION

Once the model is rightly defined, we can perform an analysis by simulation. In this case, we will study the H-field inside the inductor, at 200 MHz, using the FEM analysis, and we are going to draw this one, being shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4 – Excitación magnética en el interior del inductor

The result is drawn in a vector mode, since we have chosen that representation to see the H-field direction inside the inductor. We can verify, first, that the maximum H-field is inside the inductor, to the positive section on Y axis in the upper area, while in the lower part the orientation the inverse. The maximum H-field level obtained is 2330 A/m with 1 W excitation between the inductor electrodes.

The behavior is precisely that of an induction whose value can also be estimated by calculating its impedance and drawiing it on Smith’s chart, Fig. 5.

Fig. 5 – Impedancia del inductor sobre carta de Smith

The Smith’s chart trace clearly shows an inductive impedance, which value decreases when the frequency increases, because of losses of the CoFeHfO magnetic material. Besides, these losses contribute to the resistance increasing with frequency. There will be a maximum Q in the useful band

Fig. 6 – Factor de calidad del inductor

Having a induction with losses a quality factor Q, we can draw it as a function of the frequency in Fig. 6.

Therefore, with the FEM simulation we have been able to analyze the physical parameters on a modeled structure that would have cost us much more time and effort to get by means of complex calculations and equations. This shows, as Feynman pointed out in that 1982 conference, the simulation powerful when there are accurate models and proper software to perform these analyzes.

However, the simulation has not always had the chance to get the best results. Precisely is the previous step, the importance of having an accurate model, which faithfully defines the physical behavior of any structure, which will ensure the reliability of the results.

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

The best way to check if the simulation is valid is to resort getting experimental results. Fortunately, the simulation performed on the previous inductor is got from (7), and, in this reference, the authors show experimental results that validate the results of the inductor model. In Fig. 7 and 8 we can see the inductance and resistance values, and adding the quality factor, can be compared with the experimental results of the authors.

Fig. 7 – Valor de la inductancia en función de la frecuencia

Fig. 8 – Valor de la resistencia efectiva en función de la frecuencia

The results obtained by the authors, using HFSS for the simulation of the inductor, can be seen in Fig. 9. The authors have done the simulation on the structure with and without core, and show the simulation against the experimental result . Seeing the graphs, it can be concluded that the results got in the simulation have a high level of concordance with those obtained through the experimental measurements.

This shows us that the simulation is effective when the model is reliable, and that a model is accurate when the results obtained through the simulation converge with the experimental results. In this way, we have a powerful analysis tool that will allow us to know in advance the behavior of a structure and make decisions before moving on to the prototyping process.

In any case, convergence is also important in a simulation. The FEM simulation needs that the mesh is so accurate as getting a good convergence. A low convergence level gives results far from the optimum, and very complex structures require a lot of processing speed, a high RAM use and, sometimes, must even perform a simulation on several processors. To more complex structures, the simulation time increases considerably, and that is one of its main disadvantages.

Although the FEM simulators allow the optimization of the values ​​and even today the integration with other simulators, they are still simulators that require, due to the complexity of the calculations to be carried out, powerful computers that allow to make those calculations with reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Once again, we agree with Feynman when, in that 1982 seminar, he chose precisely a topic which seemed to have no interest for the audience. Since that publication, Feynman’s article has become a classic of Physics publications. The experience that I have got over the years with several simulators, shows me that the way opened by them will have a considerable advance when quantum computers are a reality and their processing speed raises, allowing that these tools get reliable results in a short space of time.

The simulation in the physical systems has been an important progress to get results without needing to realize previous prototypes and supposes an important saving in the research and development costs.

REFERENCES

1. Feynman, R; “Simulating Physics with Computers”; International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 1982, Vols. 21, Issue 6-7, pp. 467-488, DOI: 10.1007/BF02650179.
2. Nagel, Laurence W. and Pederson, D.O. “SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis)”, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, 1973, UCB/ERL M382.
3. Gibson, Walton C., “The Method of Moments in Electromagnetics”, Segunda Edición, CRC Press, 2014, ISBN: 978-1-4822-3579-1.
4. Reddy, J.N, “An Introduction to the Finite Element Method”, Segunda Edición,  McGraw-Hill, 1993, ISBN: 0-07-051355-4.
5. Mason, Warren P., “Electromechanical Transducers and Wave Filters”, Segunda Edición, Van Nostrand Reinhold Inc., 1942, ISBN: 978-0-4420-5164-8.
6. Dong, S. Shim and Feld, David A., “A General Nonlinear Mason Model of Arbitrary Nonlinearities in a Piezoelectric Film”, IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 2010, pp. 295-300.
7. Li, LiangLiang, et al. 4, “Small-Resistance and High-Quality-Factor Magnetic Integrated Inductors on PCB”, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, Vol. 32, pp. 780-787, November 2009, DOI: 10.1109/TADVP.2009.2019845.

Studying slotline transmission lines

PCB transmission lines are an optimal and low cost solution to make guided propagation at very high frequencies. The most popular lines are microstrip and coplanar waveguide. These transmission lines are easily realizable in a printed circuit board and whose impedance can be calculated from their dimensions. In these lines, TEM modes (transverse electromagnetic) are propagated, in which there is no component in the direction of propagation. However, there are other very popular lines that can also be used at high frequencies and are known as slotlines. In this post, we are going to study the electrical behavior of slotlines and some microwave circuits that can be done with them.

At high frequencies, lines usually behave like distributed transmission lines. Therefore, it is necessary to know its impedance so that there are no losses during propagation.

The microstrip and coplanar waveguides are very popular, since they are easily implemented on a printed circuit board, they are cheap and can be easily calculated. In both lines, the propagation mode is TEM, there are no field components in the direction of propagation, and their characteristic impedance Zc and wavelength λg depend on the line dimensions and the dielectric substrate which supports them.

There is another type of line, which is usually used at very high frequencies: the slotline. This line is one slot on the copper plane through which a transverse electric mode is propagated (specifically the TE01 mode, as shown in the following figure).

Fig. 1 –  TE01 mode on a slotline

The field is confined near the slot so that the propagation has the minimum possible losses, and as the microstrip lines, there is a discontinuity due to the dielectric substrate and air. It is used as a transmission line with substrates with a high dielectric constant (around εr≥9.2), in order to confine the fields as close as possible to the slot, although they can be used as couplings on substrates with lower dielectric constants. In this way, flat antennas can be fed with the slotlines.

In this post, we will pay attention to its use as transmission lines (with high dielectric constants), and the microwave circuits that we can make with them, studying the transitions between both technologies (slotline to microstrip).

ANALYZING THE SLOTLINE TRANSMISSION LINE

Being a transmission line and like the other lines, the slotline has a characteristic impedance Zc and a wavelength λs. But besides, using the TE01 propagation mode, the electric field component which is propagated, in cylindrical coordinates, is Eφ, as it is shown in the next figure

Fig. 2 – Eφ component

This component is calculated from the magnetic components Hr and Hz, considering the Z-axis the propagation direction, which is perpendicular to the electric field. From here, we get an expression for the propagation constant kc which is

$E_{\varphi}=\dfrac {j{\omega}{\mu_0}}{k_c^2}\dfrac {\partial H_z}{\partial r}=-{\eta} \dfrac {\lambda_s}{\lambda_0}H_r$

$k_c=\dfrac {2{\pi}}{\lambda_0} \sqrt {1- \left( \dfrac {\lambda_0}{\lambda_s} \right)^2}$

where λ0 is the wavelength of the propagated field. The first thing is deduced from the expression of kc is that we will find a cuttoff wavelength λs, from which the field propagates as mode TE01, since λ0≤λs so that kc is real and there is propagation. This means that there will be a cuttoff thickness for the substrate which will depend on the dielectric constant εr. The expression for that cuttoff thickness, where there is no propagation at TE01 mode, is

${\left( \dfrac {h}{\lambda_0} \right)}_c=\dfrac {1}{4\sqrt{{\epsilon_r}-1}}$

With these expressions, Gupta (see [1], page 283) got the expressions for the line impedance Zc and the line wavelength λs, which will allow us to typify the transmission line, making microwave circuits with slotlines.

ANALYZING A SLOTLINE

As the microstrip and coplanar waveguides, slotline can be analyzed using a FEM electromagnetic simulator. We are going to study one transmission line on an RT/Duroid 6010 substrate, which dielectric constant is εr=10,8, with 0,5mm thickness. The slot width is 5mil. According to the impedance calculations, Zc is 68,4Ω and λs, 14,6mm, at 10GHz. In a 3D view, the slotline is the next

Fig. 5 – Slotline 3D view

The next graph shows the S parameters at 50Ω impedance of generator and load.

Fig. 6 – Slotline S parameters

On the Smith chart

Fig. 7 – Slotline impedance on Smith Chart

where the impedance is 36,8-j·24,4Ω at 10GHz.

It is possible to show the propagated surface current on the line in 3D view

Fig. 8 – Slot surface current, in A/m

where it can be seen that the surface current is confined as near as possible the slot. From this current, the H-field can be derived and therefore the E-field which only has a transversal component. It can be also seen two maxima on the current magnitude, which shows that the slot distance is λs.

The FEM simulation allows us to analyze the slotline lines and build microwave circuits, knowing the characterization shown in [1].

SLOTLINE-TO-MICROSTRIP TRANSITIONS

Like the slotline is one slot made on a copper plane, transitions can be made from slotline to microstrip. One typical transition is the next

Fig. 9 – Slotline-to-microstrip transitions

Microstrip lines finish in a λm/4 open circuit stub, so the current is minimal at the open circuit and maximum at the transition location. In the same way, the slotline finishes in a λs/4 short circuit stub, with the minimum surface current at the transition location. Then, the equivalent circuit for each transition is

Fig. 10 -Equivalent circuit for a slotline-to-microstrip transition

Using the FEM simulator it is possible to study how a transition behaves. The next graph shows its S parameters. The transition has been made on RT/Duroid 6010, with 70mil thickness and 25mil slot widths. The microstrip width is 50mil and the working band is 0,7÷2,7GHz.

Fig. 11 – Transition S parameters

and showing the surface current on the transition, it ts the next

Fig. 12 – Current on the transition.

where it can be seen the coupling of the current and its distribution on the slotline.

ANOTHER MICROWAVE CIRCUITS BASED ON SLOTLINES

The slotline is a versatile line. Combined with microstrip (the microstrip ground plane can include slots), it allows us to make a series of interesting circuits, such as those shown in fig. 13

Fig. 13 – Microwave circuits with slotline and microstrip.

The 13 (a) circuit shows a balum with slotline and microstrip technology, where the microstrip is shorted to ground in the transition. The balanced part is the slotline section, since both ground planes are working like differential ports, while the unbalanced part is the microstrip, referring to the ground plane where the slots are placed. With this circuit it is possible to build frequency mixers or balanced mixers. Another interesting circuit is shown in 13 (b), a “rat-race” where the microstrip circuit is not closed, but is coupled through a slot to get the coupling. In 13 (c), a “branchline” coupler is shown, using a slotline and, finally, in 13 (d), a Ronde coupler is shown. This last circuit is ideal to equalize the odd/even mode phase velocities.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post, we have analyzed the slotline used like a microwave transmission line, compared with another technologie. Besides we have made a small behavior analysis using an FEM simulator, checking the possibilities of the line analysis (S parameters and surface current analysis) and we have shown some circuits that can be made with this technology, verifying the versatility of this transmission line.

REFERENCES

1. Gupta, K.C., et al. “Microstrip Lines and Slotlines”. 2nd. s.l. : Artech House, Inc, 1996. ISBN 0-89006-766-X.

Simulating transitions with waveguides

Waveguides are transmission lines widely used in very high frequency applications as guided propagation devices. Their main advantages are the reduction of losses in the propagation, due to the use of a single conductor and air, instead of using dielectrics as in the coaxial cable, a greater capacity to use high power and a simple building. Their main drawbacks are usually that they are bulky devices, that they cannot operate below their cutoff frequency and that the guide transitions to other technologies (such as coaxial or microstrip) have often losses. However, finite element method (FEM) simulation allows us to study and optimize the transitions that can be built with these devices, getting very good results. In this post we will study the waveguides using an FEM simulator such as HFSS, which is able to analyze tridimensional electromagnetic fields (3D simulation).

Waveguides are very popular in very high frequency circuits, due to the ease of their building and their low losses. The propagated fields, unlike the coaxial guides, are electric or magnetic transverse (TE or TM fields), so they have a magnetic field component (TE) or electric field (TM) in the propagation direction. These fields are the solutions for the Helmholtz equation under certain boundary conditions

• For the TE modes, Ez(x,y)=0

$\left( \dfrac {{\partial}^2}{\partial x^2} +\dfrac {{\partial}^2}{\partial y^2} +k_c^2\right)H_z(x,y)=0$

• For the TM modes, Hz(x,y)=0

$\left( \dfrac {{\partial}^2}{\partial x^2} +\dfrac {{\partial}^2}{\partial y^2} +k_c^2\right)E_z(x,y)=0$

and solving these differential equations by separation of variables, and applying the boundary conditions of a rectangular enclosure, where all the walls are electrical walls (conductors, in which the tangential component of the electric field is canceled)

Fig. 2 – Boundary conditions on a rectangular waveguide

we can obtain a set of solutions for the electromagnetic field inside the guide, starting from the solution obtained for the expressions shown in fig. 1.

Fig. 3 – Table of electromagnetic fields and parameters in rectangular waveguides

Therefore, electromagnetic fields are propagated like propagation modes, called TEmn, for the transverse electric (Ez=0), or TMmn, for the transverse magnetic (Hz=0). From the propagation constant Kc is got an expression for the cutoff frequencyfc, which is the lowest frequency for propagating fields inside the waveguide, which expression is

$f_c=\dfrac {c}{2} \sqrt {\left( \dfrac {m}{a} \right) ^2+\left( \dfrac {n}{b} \right) ^2}$

The lowest mode is when m=0, since although the function has extremes for m,n=0, the modes TE00 or TM00 do not exist. And like a>b, the lowest cutoff frequency of the waveguide is for the mode TE10. That is the mode we are going to analyze using a 3D FEM simulation.

SIMULATION OF A RECTANGULAR WAVEGUIDE BY THE FINITE ELEMENTS METHOD

In a 3D simulator it is very easy to model a rectangular waveguide, since it is enough to draw a rectangular prism with the appropriate dimensions a and b. In this case, a=3,10mm and b=1,55mm. The TE10 mode start to propagate at 48GHz the next mode, TE01, at 97GHz, then the waveguide is analyzed at 76GHz, frequency in which it will work. Drawing the waveguide in HFSS, it is shown so

Fig. 5 – Rectangular waveguide. HFSS model

The inner rectangular prism is assigned to vacuum, and the side faces are assigned perfect E boundaries. Two wave ports are assigned on the rectangles at -z/2 and +z/2 , using the first propagation mode. The next figure shows the E-field along the waveguide

Fig. 6 – Electric field inside the waveguide

Analyzing the Scattering parameters from 40 to 90GHz, it is got

Fig. 7 – S parameters for the rectangular waveguide

where it can be seen that the first mode starts to propagate inside the waveguide at 48,5GHz.

From 97GHz, TE01 mode could be propagated too, it does not interest us, then the analysis is done at 76GHz.

WAVEGUIDE TRANSITIONS

The most common transitions are from waveguide to coaxial, or from waveguide to microstrip line, to be able to use the propagated energy in another kind of applications. For this, a probe is placed in the direction of the E-field, coupling its energy on the probe. (TE01 mode is in Y-axis)

Fig. 8 – Probe location

The probe is a quarter wavelength resonant antenna at the desired frequency. In X-axis, E-field maximum value happens at x=a/2, while to find the maximum in Z-axis, the guide is finished in a short circuit. So, E-field is null on the guide wall, being maximum at a quarter guide wavelength which is

${\lambda_g}=\dfrac {\lambda}{\sqrt {1-\left( \dfrac {f_c}{f} \right)^2}}$

and in our case, at 76GHz, λ is 3,95mm and λg, 5,11mm. Then, the probe length will be 0,99mm and the shortcircuit distance, 2,56mm.

In coaxial transitions, it is enough to put a coax whose internal conductor protrude λ/4 at λg/4 from the shortcircuit. But in microstrip transitions dielectrics are used as support of the conductor lines, then it should be kept in mindpor the dielectric effect, too.

Our transition can be modeled in HFSS by assigning different materials. The probe is built on Rogers RO3003 substrate, with low dielectric constant and losses, making the transition to microstrip. The lateral faces and the lines are assigned to perfect E boundaries, and form of the substrate, to a RO3003 material. The waveguide inside and the transition cavity is assigned to vacuum. In the extreme face of the transition, a wave port is assigned.

Fig. 10 – Rectangular waveguide to microstrip transition

Now, the simulation is done analyzing the fields and S parameters.

Fig. 11 – E-field on the transition

and it can be seen how the E-field couples to the probe and the signal is propagated along the microstrip.

Fig. 12 – Transition S parameters

Seeing the S parameters, we can see that the least loss coupling happens at 76÷78GHz, our working frequency.

OTHER DEVICES IN WAVEGUIDES: THE MAGIC TEE

Among the usual waveguide devices, one of the most popular is the Magic Tee, a special combiner which can be used like a divider, a combiner and a signal adder/subtractor.

Fig. 13 – Magic Tee

Its behavior is very simple: when an EM field is fed by port 2, the signal is divided and in phase by ports 1 and 3. Port 4 is isolated because its E-plane is perpendicular to the port 2 E-plane. But if the EM field is fed by port 4, it is divided into ports 1 and 3 in phase opposition (180deg) while port 2 is now isolated.

Using the FEM simulation to analyze the Magic Tee, and feeding the power through port 2, it is got the next response

Fig. 14 – E-field inside the Magic Tee feeding by the port 2.

and the power is splitted in ports 1 and 3 while port 4 is isolated. Doing the same operation from port 4, it is got

Fig. 15 – E-field inside the Magic Tee feeding by the port 4.

where now port 2 is isolated.

To see the phases, it is used a vector plot of the E-field

Fig. 16 – Vector E-field inside the Magic Tee feeding by the port 2

where it is seen that the field in ports 1 and 3 has the same direction and therefore they are in phase. Feeding from port 4

Fig. 17 – Vector E-field inside the Magic Tee feeding by the port 2

in which it is seen that the signals in port 1 and 3 has the same level, but in phase opposition (180deg between them).

FEM simulation allows us to analyze the behavior of the EM field from different points of view, only changing the excitations. For example, feeding a signal in phase by port 2 and 4, both signals will be added in phase at port3 and will be nulled at port 1.

Fig. 18 – E-field inside the feeding by ports 2 and 4 in phase.

whereas if inverting the phase in port 2 or port 4, the signals will be added at port 1 and will be nulled at port 3.

Fig. 19 – E-field inside the feeding by ports 2 and 4 in phase opposition

and the result is a signal adder/subtractor.

CONCLUSIONS

The object of this post was the analysis of the electrical behavior of the waveguides using a 3D FEM simulator. The advantage of using these simulators is that they allow to analyze with good precision the EM fields on three-dimensional structures, being the modeling the most important part to rightly define the structure to be studied, since a 3D simulator requires meshing in the structure, and this meshing, as it needs a high number of tetrahedra to achieve good convergence, also tends to need more machine memory and processing capacity.
The structures analyzed, due to their simplicity, have not required long simulation time and relevant processing capacity, but as the models become more complex, the processing capacity increases, it it is needed to achieve a good accuracy.

In subsequent posts, another methods to reduce modeling in complex structures will be analyzed, through the use of planes of symmetry that allow us to divide the structure and reduce meshing considerably..

REFERENCES

1. Daniel G. Swanson, Jr.,Wolfgang J. R. Hoefer; “Microwave Circuit Modeling Using Electromagnetic Field Simulation”; Artech House, 2003, ISBN 1-58053-308-6
2. Paul Wade, “Rectangular Waveguide to Coax Transition Design”, QEX, Nov/Dec 2006